Alright. This is perhaps my first time
choosing an antagonist for my Character Thursday. I write this based
on two novels of D'Artagnan Romances: The Three Musketeers and Twenty
Years After. I choose this character because he appears only in the
first, and all people remember him on the second. The other
characters, on the contrary, still develop, so I must wait until I
finish them all before I can judge Aramis, D'Artagnan, or Raoul. And
perhaps I will write more about the dear count, Athos.
Cardinal Richelieu is introduced as an
ambitious, lusty person in the first novel. There is a rivalry
between him and the king as to who has the best guard. Out musketeers
prove that the king wins, in that respect only. The Cardinal rules
France. He is even more powerful than the king himself.
The novel hints that he loves the
queen, Anne of Austria, who doesn't share the same feeling towards
him. Besides the Queen, Richelieu also has two other women mentioned
in the novel as his lovers. As Aramis, he's not really faithful to
his call as a 'man of God'.
Portrait of the Cardinal by Philippe de Champaigne (1640) |
As a politician, however, he excels.
The Musketeers don't like him at all, and refuse to serve under him,
but even Aramis admits (sincerely or not) that he is “the most
illustrious politician of times past, of times present, and probably
of times to come” that would “extinguish the sun if the sun
incommoded him.” But France seems to be peaceful during his reign,
at least compared to what it becomes under Mazarin, as stated in
Twenty Years After.
Being an enemy of the Four Inseparables
doesn't make him act unjustly to them. He applauds the courageous
action of Athos and his companions in Bastion St. Gervais, and
rewards them for their deeds. Later, when he meets the four having a
council together, Athos pays a sharp sarcastic statement to him. But
instead of killing him, he just goes away, murmuring that he would be
happy to have the four. Who wouldn't? Lastly, when D'Artagnan comes
to him with Milady's carte blanche,
he tears the paper, but he doesn't seem angry towards the young
soldier, but instead he promotes him to be a lieutenant. So to a
certain degree, he's still a gentleman.
The
sequel, Twenty Years After, makes it clear that our friends respect
Richelieu, despite their private experiences with him.They even praise
him as a great Cardinal. From the second novel, I learn not to judge
people too rashly, too hastily. That's my character for this week,
what about yours?
PS: This character analysis is solely based on the novel, and not from the real person. I have done no research about Armand Jean du Plessis, and therefore cannot say anything in or out favour of him.
---------------------------------------------
Character Thursday
Adalah book blog hop di mana setiap blog memposting tokoh pilihan dalam buku yang sedang atau telah dibaca selama seminggu terakhir (judul atau genre buku bebas).
- Kalian bisa menjelaskan mengapa kalian suka/benci tokoh itu, sekilas kepribadian si tokoh, atau peranannya dalam keseluruhan kisah.
- Jangan lupa mencantumkan juga cover buku yang tokohnya kalian ambil.
- Kalau buku itu sudah difilmkan, kalian juga bisa mencantumkan foto si tokoh dalam film, atau foto aktor/aktris yang kalian anggap cocok dengan kepribadian si tokoh.
Syarat Mengikuti :
1. Follow blog Fanda Classiclit sebagai host, bisa lewat Google Friend Connect (GFC) atau sign up via e-mail (ada di sidebar paling kanan). Dengan follow blog ini, kalian akan selalu tahu setiap kali blog ini mengadakan Character Thursday Blog Hop.
2. Letakkan button Character Thursday Blog Hop di posting kalian atau di sidebar blog, supaya follower kalian juga bisa menemukan blog hop ini. Kodenya bisa diambil di kotak di button.
3. Buat posting dengan menyertakan copy-paste “Character Thursday” dan “Syarat Mengikuti” ke dalam postingmu.
3. Isikan link (URL) posting kalian ke Linky di bawah ini. Cantumkan nama dengan format: Nama blogger @ nama blog, misalnya: Fanda @ Fanda Classiclit.
4. Jangan lupa kunjungi blog-blog peserta lain, dan temukan tokoh-tokoh pilihan mereka. Dengan begini, wawasan kita akan bertambah juga dengan buku-buku baru yang menarik
Belum baca lanjutannya jadi masih tetep menganggap Cardinal ini tokoh yang gak menyenangkan. Mungkin dia bersikap gentleman untuk tetap menjaga image dan kedudukannya. Bukan sesuatu yangmemang dilakukan dari hatinya :p
ReplyDeleteHahaha. Nanti setelah baca Twenty Years After mungkin lebih jelas. Ayo, baca, baca. *mulai fangirling*
DeleteOh yes, I think Richelieu has a gentleman qualities in him that received respects even from his enemies. Compared to Mazarin, well...Richelieu almost seemed like a protagonist :D
ReplyDeleteIt's a great idea, Listra, to feature an antagonist for your Character hursday!
Thank you.
DeleteYes, I think both as politician and a man I prefer Richelieu to Mazarin. Richelieu is more certain of himself and have this menacing aura around him, while Mazarin is just a greedy minister. No wonder Athos reproaches him harshly.