Don't be angry with me,
Shakespeare lovers. (Do we have a word for Shakespeare's fans, you
know, like Sherlockians for Sherlock Holmes?) This is the first
Shakespearian History that I truly read from enter to exeunt. But I
cannot say that it's as entertaining as As You Like It
(and I doubt it's supposed to), or as intriguing as Hamlet,
or even its kin, Julius Caesar.
Richard III
focuses on the events leading to Richard III's enthronement, complete
with the killing of Clarence, the king, and later on, the two
princes. Then the story goes to the military campaign of Richmond
which later succeeded the crown.
In
the play, Richard is depicted as cruel, sly, ugly, and wicked. He has
been very detestable even since the start of the play. The more
annoying he is, the more I don't believe the story. I mean, nobody
could be that cruel. I wonder if the play could be categorized as
“historical fiction” instead of “historical play.” I think I
need to do further research before I determine which story I should
trust and which I should distrust.
Still,
the play is a good thing. Well, of course it is, Shakespeare wrote
it. (Perhaps I am a little bit biased when it comes to the Bard.) My
favourite scene, is perhaps, the ghosts coming to Richard and
Richmond's tent, threatening and cursing the one and blessing the
other. Similar scene appears in Julius Caesar, but the ghost comes to
Brutus only. In this play, however, the ghosts come to both parties
and make the contrast between Richard and Richmond even stronger.
That's
all I think. I can't wait to do some little research and post it as a
part of the #LRP event. You shall hear more Richard from me. ;)
I failed to read it last month, but will slip it somewhere during #LRP, so I can't comment much about Richard III now. But as it is in my WEM's list, I think it will be interesting to do analysis and research around the play.
ReplyDeleteOf course, of course. Richard III is surprisingly interesting.
Delete